A joint letter from Remember A Charity, Institute of Fundraising, Institute of Legacy Management and NCVO was sent to Lucy Frazer MP, alerting her to the negative impact of the planned changes on charities and requesting a meeting to discuss a proposed alternative approach.\r\n\r\nThe Telegraph reported on the\u00a0probate fee 'stealth tax' and its impact on charities.\r\n\r\n7 February 2019\r\n\r\nPlans to hike probate fees were approved by Government. The plans were approved by nine votes to eight at a Delegated Legislation Committee.\r\n\r\nIt is estimated this could cost charities in the region of 10 million annually in legacy income.\r\n\r\nLucy Frazer MP, the Minister responsible for the legislation, confirmed the new charges will come into force in April, barring a majority of objections by the House of Commons. She also stated that guidance\u00a0on how to pay fees will be published before the changes take effect.\r\n\r\nThe next stage is for the Order to go to the House of Commons for approval. The date for this has not yet been announced.\r\n\r\n9 January 2019\r\n\r\nSTEP received a reply to a letter to\u00a0Lucy Frazer MP, the Minister responsible for the legislation, which set out their concerns with the proposed changes. The reply restated the government\u2019s rationale for introducing the measure and refuted the assertion that it represented a tax rather than a fee covering the cost of a service. You can read the full reply\u00a0here.\r\n\r\n18 December 2018\r\n\r\nThe\u00a0Non-Contentious Probate Fees Order 2018\u00a0was debated in the House of Lords on 18 December 2018. As an affirmative measure it required a majority to pass. The House stopped short of rejecting the Order, but put on record its concerns, with the following Motion to Regret moved by Lord Beecham:\r\n\r\n\u2018This House regrets that the draft Order will introduce a revised non-contentious probate fee structure considered by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee to be \u201cso far above the actual cost of the service [it] arguably amounts to a stealth tax and, therefore, a misuse of the fee-levying power\u201d under section 180 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014; and that this Order represents a significant move away from the principle that fees for a public service should recover the cost of providing it and no more.\u2019\r\n\r\n5 November 2018\r\n\r\nLucy Frazer MP, the justice minister, announced that the government was\u00a0revising its previous proposals for reforming probate fees\u00a0and would be pushing ahead with removing the existing flat rate of \u00a3215.\r\n\r\nInstead, probate fee bands would be brought in, she said, with estates of more than \u00a350,000 paying between \u00a3250 and \u00a36,000, with the maximum amount reserved for estates worth more than \u00a32m.\r\n\r\nIn response to the Government\u2019s announcement of this new probate fee structure, the director of Remember A Charity, Rob Cope, said:\r\n\r\n\u201cThe new probate structure will see charitable Wills costing \u2013 in some cases \u2013 thousands of pounds more than they do currently and our concern is that this could deter people from leaving a donation in their Will. After all, if estate planning comes with such a hefty price tag for wealthy individuals \u2013 many of whom leave sizable gifts to charity \u2013 they may think again.\r\n\r\n\u201cWhile Government expects to generate \u00a3185 million from the increased charges by 2022-2023, it is important to remember that charitable bequests are worth almost \u00a33 billion a year for good causes. The sector cannot afford to risk losing legacy income and we call on Government to consider the potential disproportionate impact of this decision."