I don\u2019t know about you, but I\u2019m more and more befuddled by the claims and counterclaims in the Brexit campaign. Late last month, the Government warned that leaving the EU would add \u00a3230 to a family holiday, cost 820,000 UK jobs and slash \u00a332,000 from the average pension. Not to mention the incipient threat of World War 3 and unchecked terrorists stalking our streets.\r\n\r\nMeanwhile, the Leave campaigners bellow about the arrival of hundreds of thousands more immigrants, jumping the queues for housing, benefits and NHS operations. No doubt with killer Spanish slugs stowed away in their hand luggage!\r\n\r\nSeparating the facts from the hype\r\n\r\nOk, so I made the last bit up, but as 23rd June looms ever nearer, it\u2019s increasingly hard to separate the facts from the hype. And in truth, no-one knows what will happen if we stay or go \u2013 with due respect to my colleagues, macroeconomics is more art than science!\r\n\r\nIn all, the balance of probability suggests that in the short term, leaving the EU would have a negative effect on the UK economy. In the two years it would take to negotiate a new deal on trade and market access, there would be considerable uncertainty.\r\n\r\nExchange rates would fall, pushing up import prices. Share prices would tumble, along with corporate confidence. And house prices in London and the south east would suffer as international banks and foreign investors moved elsewhere.\r\n\r\nNegative, but far from disastrous \r\n\r\nWell-respected forecasters Oxford Economics \u2013 a level-headed and independent bunch \u2013 have developed a range of nine alternative post-Brexit scenarios. Their conclusion is that \u201cthe opportunities and risks of EU withdrawal are asymmetric\u201d. In other words, the downside is greater than the upside. At best, GDP would fall by just 0.1%...at worst it would drop by a \u201cfar from disastrous\u201d 3.9%.\r\n\r\nWhy does this matter for charitable legacies? Because the legacy income received at any one time is linked to the value of the houses, shares and other assets left in people\u2019s estates. So if the UK were to leave the EU, we\u2019re likely to see legacy incomes stutter, maybe fall.\r\n\r\nFamily top of mind\r\n\r\nThe deep-rooted uncertainty underlying the Brexit debate (whichever way it falls) may also dampen the \u2018propensity\u2019 to leave a gift to charity. At times like these, people\u2019s desire to protect their family - now and well into the future - comes top of mind, leaving little space for other beneficiaries.\r\n\r\nWhile the effect of this change would not be seen for 5-10 years (the average gap between last Will and death is 6 years,) it could reduce the number of charitable bequests left in the longer term.\r\n\r\nLet\u2019s not panic!\r\n\r\nBut hold on...I\u2019m starting to sound like one of the \u201cGloomadon Poppers\u201d Boris Johnson loves to hate. Despite the narrowing gap between leavers and remainers in the polls, my money is still on us staying in a (duly reformed) EU.\r\n\r\nAnd if we choose to leave the Union, like Oxford Economics, I believe it would be far from disastrous in the long run. We are a resourceful and resilient country that will thrive whichever route we choose. I\u2019m far more worried about those killer slugs!\r\n\r\nMeg Abdy, Director of Legacy Foresight\r\n\r\nHave you read our blog from Katie Lindsay, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability supporter?